The Influence of The Vidovdan Myth on Serbia’s Security Strategy and Foreign Policy Towards Kosovo

Authors

  • Prof. Dr. Bejtush Gashi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69921/xwhdww76

Keywords:

Vidovdan, security strategy , political myth, hybrid warfare, Srpski Svet, Serbia, Kosovo

Abstract

The Vidovdan myth holds a central place in Serbian political mythology and has evolved into a strategic instrument in shaping Serbia’s foreign and security policy, particularly in relation to Kosovo. This study examines how the myth is employed to legitimize Serbia’s revisionist discourse, justify interference in Kosovo’s internal affairs, and construct a permanent threat doctrine. Relying on the constructivist approach in international relations and political discourse analysis, the article argues that Vidovdan functions as an ideological mechanism with significant impact on regional security, Euro-Atlantic integration processes, and Kosovo’s international standing.

References

Bieber, F. (2018). Patterns of competitive authoritarianism in the Western Balkans. East European Politics, 34(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1490272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1490272

Council of the European Union. (2013–2020). Brussels Agreement and the Kosovo–Serbia dialogue. Official documents. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Gashi, B. (2018). Minority rights and security challenges in the Western Balkans. Journal of Balkan Security Studies, 5(2), 45–62.

Glenny, M. (2001). The Balkans: Nationalism, war, and the great powers, 1804–1999. London: Penguin Books.

Ignatieff, M. (1994). Blood and belonging: Journeys into the new nationalism. London: BBC Books.

International Crisis Group. (2013). Serbia and Kosovo: The path to normalization (Europe Report No. 231). Brussels: International Crisis Group. https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/balkans/kosovo/serbia-and-kosovo-path-normalization

Miskovic, M. (2017). The Vidovdan myth and Serbian national identity. Journal of Balkan Studies, 45(2), 145–162.

Millosheviq, S. (1989, June 28). Speech at Gazimestan. Yugoslav Historical Archives. Belgrade.

Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. (1986). The SANU Memorandum. Belgrade: SANU.

Ristić, L. (2010). The Kosovo myth: Serbian nationalism and the politics of history. Balkan Insight. Retrieved from https://balkaninsight.com/2010/06/28/the-kosovo-myth-and-nationalism/

Radio Television of Serbia (RTS). (2019–2024). Broadcasts and commemorations of Vidovdan. Retrieved from https://www.rts.rs/

Sputnik Serbia. (2020–2024). Analyses and commentary on the “sacred Serbian land”. Retrieved from https://rs.sputniknews.com/

Todorova, M. (1997). Imagining the Balkans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183

Online Reports and Institutional Documents

NATO/KFOR. (2023). Report on troop reinforcements and patrol activity following the Banjska attack. Retrieved from https://europarl.europa.eu, https://koha.net, https://cna.al, https://balkans.aljazeera.net

European Parliament. (2023). Resolution on EULEX–KFOR cooperation in the investigation of the Banjska incident. Retrieved from https://europarl.europa.eu

White House National Security Council. (2023). Statement on Serbian troop movements near the Kosovo border. Washington, DC: White House. Retrieved from https://whitehouse.gov

NATO Parliamentary Assembly. (2023). Report on the withdrawal of militants from Banjska. Retrieved from https://koha.net, https://reuters.com, https://n1info.rs, https://telegrafi.com

EULEX Kosovo. (2023). Documents supporting Kosovo Police investigations following the Banjska attack. Pristina: EULEX.

Kirby, J. (2023, September 25). Statement on the coordinated terrorist attack in Banjska. U.S. National Security Council Press Office.

Downloads

Published

07.07.2025

Issue

Vol. 4 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Octopus Journal: Hybrid Warfare & Strategic Conflicts

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All articles published in our "Octopus Journal: Hybrid Warfare & Strategic Conflicts" are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This means that:

  • You are free to share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • You are free to adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The only requirement is that you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses you or your use.

This license allows for maximum dissemination and use of the materials published in our journal, while authors retain copyright ownership of their work. We believe this open licensing approach best serves the needs of both authors and readers in advancing research and scholarship.

If you have any questions about the copyright and licensing for our journal, please don’t hesitate to contact us.

The journal is an open-access publication (OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL), making its content accessible to a wide global audience, including researchers, professionals, and policymakers. Authors wishing to contribute are welcome to submit their papers for review.

How to Cite

Gashi, B. (2025). The Influence of The Vidovdan Myth on Serbia’s Security Strategy and Foreign Policy Towards Kosovo. Octopus Journal: Hybrid Warfare & Strategic Conflicts, 4. https://doi.org/10.69921/xwhdww76
Share |

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.